Generosity made simple

Your church meets the expecation

Your church scored 58%
58%

Needs
improvement

Meets
expectations

Exceeds
expectations

  • CHURCH GIVING
    86%
  • LEADERSHIP GIVING
    75%
  • DIGITAL GIVING
    73%
  • STAFF GIVING
    65%
  • LOCAL GIVING
    81%
# Name Church Leadership Digital Staff Local Avg (%)
1 Dana Calhoun 83.33 66.67 66.67 66.67 66.67 70
2 Savanna Ben Foster 100 91.67 100 66.67 66.67 85
3 Bridget Othoudt 91.67 83.33 75 58.33 58.33 73
4 Heidi Bell 75 66.67 75 75 75 73
5 Don Hannay 83.33 66.67 83.33 75 75 77
6 Jessica Babb 83.33 83.33 91.67 75 75 82
7 Debora Calhoun 100 83.33 91.67 83.33 83.33 88
8 Jerry Calhoun 100 91.67 91.67 83.33 83.33 90
9 Eric Babb 91.67 91.67 41.67 16.67 16.67 52
10 Danielle Trebesch 83.33 50 66.67 75 75 70
11 Rachael Hannay 83.33 75 50 50 50 62
12 Faith Goenner 91.67 66.67 58.33 58.33 58.33 67
13 Dennis Calhoun 75 50 66.67 50 50 58
14 Nick Duren 83.33 91.67 83.33 83.33 83.33 85
15 Bob Othoudt 66.67 66.67 58.33 58.33 58.33 62
Church Average 86 75 73 65 81 76%

Detailed Report:

Celebrate what you’re doing well
  1. 1. How urgently do you want to unleash
    generosity in your church?
  2. 2. Our church generously lets the local community use the church facility during the week.
  3. 3. Our church is intentionally teaching about generosity and engaging congregants in related discussions annually.


Focus on what needs immediate attention
  1. 1. Our church uses tools like Round-Up giving to help congregants give even while making everyday purchases outside of church.
  2. 2. Our leadership team prioritizes the need to enrich the culture of generosity in our church.
  3. 3. Our church invests in helping our staff and volunteers model generosity cheerfully.
  • Review current areas of great alignment
    • Our church is not satisfied with the status quo of our congregation’s generosity.
      Absolutely true
    • Our church constantly invests into assessing and understanding what our congregation currently thinks about generosity.
      Absolutely true
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church is intentionally teaching about generosity and engaging congregants in related discussions annually.
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our leadership team prioritizes the need to enrich the culture of generosity in our church.
    • Our leadership team is very careful and intentional about what we say during ‘offering’ time.
    • Our leadership team analyzes ‘giving’ data in our church to understand the relationship between our congregation’s generosity and their faith journey.
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church lets people give anytime and from anywhere through online/mobile giving.
    • Multi-format giving (and not just online giving) across cash, checks, text, online, kiosk etc. is integrated in our church.
    • Our church uses tools like Round-Up giving to help congregants give even while making everyday purchases outside of church.
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church invests in helping our staff and volunteers model generosity cheerfully.
    • Our church staff practices what we preach by modeling giving well.
    • Our church focuses on generosity around the year and not just during Q4.
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church is generous in meeting needs around us outside our church.
    • Our church generously lets the local community use the church facility during the week.
    • The number of new givers in our congregation is consistently increasing over time.

Team Average Urgency Score

Participant Votes
0
0
1
2
12
  • Not
    urgent
  • Hardly
    urgent
  • Unsure
  • Slightly
    urgent
  • Absolutely
    urgent
Hurdles
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0.75
  • 0.25
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0.75
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
Enablers
  • 0.75
  • 0.50
  • 0.50
  • 0.50
  • 0.50
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 0.75
  • 0.50
  • 1
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 0.75
  • 0.50
  • 0.25
assessment scores