Generosity made simple

Your church meets the expecation

Your church scored 55%
55%

Needs
improvement

Meets
expectations

Exceeds
expectations

  • CHURCH GIVING
    82%
  • LEADERSHIP GIVING
    77%
  • DIGITAL GIVING
    79%
  • STAFF GIVING
    64%
  • LOCAL GIVING
    79%
# Name Church Leadership Digital Staff Local Avg (%)
1 Michael Cassidy 66.67 75 25 41.67 41.67 50
2 Peyton Bell 83.33 66.67 91.67 83.33 83.33 82
3 Donna Johnson 100 50 100 75 75 80
4 Lily Cassidy 91.67 100 83.33 58.33 58.33 78
5 Jon Shepherd 66.67 58.33 91.67 83.33 83.33 77
6 Jeff Houston 83.33 75 75 66.67 66.67 73
7 Bennett Clements 83.33 91.67 100 58.33 58.33 78
8 Randy Draper 83.33 75 83.33 75 75 78
9 Jennifer Wood 66.67 83.33 83.33 50 50 67
10 Julia Houston 83.33 66.67 41.67 41.67 41.67 55
11 Ron Wilds 100 66.67 83.33 50 50 70
12 Ava Kusick 100 58.33 100 83.33 83.33 85
13 Skye Clements 66.67 75 50 58.33 58.33 62
14 Ken Howard 83.33 83.33 83.33 83.33 83.33 83
15 Brian Bruders 83.33 91.67 100 100 100 95
16 Christy Martin 91.67 91.67 83.33 66.67 66.67 80
17 Shawna Meierarend 91.67 100 75 41.67 41.67 70
18 Laura Willard 75 75 58.33 58.33 58.33 65
19 Jon Shepherd 58.33 75 83.33 50 50 63
Church Average 82 77 79 64 79 76%

Detailed Report:

Celebrate what you’re doing well
  1. 1. Our church generously lets the local community use the church facility during the week.
  2. 2. How urgently do you want to unleash
    generosity in your church?
  3. 3. Our church is not satisfied with the status quo of our congregation’s generosity.


Focus on what needs immediate attention
  1. 1. Our church invests in helping our staff and volunteers model generosity cheerfully.
  2. 2. Our church focuses on generosity around the year and not just during Q4.
  3. 3. Our church is generous in meeting needs around us outside our church.
  • Review current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church is not satisfied with the status quo of our congregation’s generosity.
    • Our church constantly invests into assessing and understanding what our congregation currently thinks about generosity.
    • Our church is intentionally teaching about generosity and engaging congregants in related discussions annually.
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our leadership team prioritizes the need to enrich the culture of generosity in our church.
    • Our leadership team is very careful and intentional about what we say during ‘offering’ time.
    • Our leadership team analyzes ‘giving’ data in our church to understand the relationship between our congregation’s generosity and their faith journey.
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church lets people give anytime and from anywhere through online/mobile giving.
    • Multi-format giving (and not just online giving) across cash, checks, text, online, kiosk etc. is integrated in our church.
    • Our church uses tools like Round-Up giving to help congregants give even while making everyday purchases outside of church.
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church invests in helping our staff and volunteers model generosity cheerfully.
    • Our church staff practices what we preach by modeling giving well.
    • Our church focuses on generosity around the year and not just during Q4.
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
    • Our church generously lets the local community use the church facility during the week.
      Absolutely true
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church is generous in meeting needs around us outside our church.
    • The number of new givers in our congregation is consistently increasing over time.

Team Average Urgency Score

Participant Votes
0
0
2
3
14
  • Not
    urgent
  • Hardly
    urgent
  • Unsure
  • Slightly
    urgent
  • Absolutely
    urgent
Hurdles
  • 0.75
  • 1
  • 0.75
  • 0.75
  • 0.50
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 0.50
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.50
  • 0.25
  • 0.75
  • 0.75
  • 0.50
  • 0
  • 0.50
  • 0.50
Enablers
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 0.75
  • 0.75
  • 0.50
  • 0.50
  • 0.50
  • 0.50
  • 0.25
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 0.50
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
assessment scores