Generosity made simple

Your church meets the expecation

Your church scored 37%
37%

Needs
improvement

Meets
expectations

Exceeds
expectations

  • CHURCH GIVING
    17%
  • LEADERSHIP GIVING
    67%
  • DIGITAL GIVING
    75%
  • STAFF GIVING
    75%
  • LOCAL GIVING
    75%
# Name Church Leadership Digital Staff Local Avg (%)
1 Steve CF24 0 33.33 50 50 50 37
2 Steve CF25 33.33 100 100 100 100 87
Church Average 17 67 75 75 75 62%

Detailed Report:

Celebrate what you’re doing well
  1. 1. The number of new givers in our congregation is consistently increasing over time.
  2. 2. Our leadership team is very careful and intentional about what we say during ‘offering’ time.
  3. 3. Our leadership team analyzes ‘giving’ data in our church to understand the relationship between our congregation’s generosity and their faith journey.


Focus on what needs immediate attention
  1. 1. Our church constantly invests into assessing and understanding what our congregation currently thinks about generosity.
  2. 2. Our church is not satisfied with the status quo of our congregation’s generosity.
  3. 3. Our church is intentionally teaching about generosity and engaging congregants in related discussions annually.
  • Review current areas of great alignment
    • Our church is not satisfied with the status quo of our congregation’s generosity.
      Absolutely false
    • Our church constantly invests into assessing and understanding what our congregation currently thinks about generosity.
      Absolutely false
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church is intentionally teaching about generosity and engaging congregants in related discussions annually.
      • Steve CF24 Absolutely false
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our leadership team prioritizes the need to enrich the culture of generosity in our church.
      • Steve CF24 Absolutely false
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true
    • Our leadership team is very careful and intentional about what we say during ‘offering’ time.
      • Steve CF24 Unsure
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true
    • Our leadership team analyzes ‘giving’ data in our church to understand the relationship between our congregation’s generosity and their faith journey.
      • Steve CF24 Unsure
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church lets people give anytime and from anywhere through online/mobile giving.
      • Steve CF24 Unsure
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true
    • Multi-format giving (and not just online giving) across cash, checks, text, online, kiosk etc. is integrated in our church.
      • Steve CF24 Unsure
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true
    • Our church uses tools like Round-Up giving to help congregants give even while making everyday purchases outside of church.
      • Steve CF24 Unsure
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church invests in helping our staff and volunteers model generosity cheerfully.
      • Steve CF24 Unsure
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true
    • Our church staff practices what we preach by modeling giving well.
      • Steve CF24 Unsure
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true
    • Our church focuses on generosity around the year and not just during Q4.
      • Steve CF24 Unsure
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church is generous in meeting needs around us outside our church.
      • Steve CF24 Unsure
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true
    • Our church generously lets the local community use the church facility during the week.
      • Steve CF24 Unsure
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true
    • The number of new givers in our congregation is consistently increasing over time.
      • Steve CF24 Unsure
      • Steve CF25 Absolutely true

Team Average Urgency Score

Participant Votes
0
0
1
0
1
  • Not
    urgent
  • Hardly
    urgent
  • Unsure
  • Slightly
    urgent
  • Absolutely
    urgent
Hurdles
  • 0.50
  • 1
Enablers
  • 0.50
  • 1
assessment scores